.png)
While we try not to bore you too much with case law, this was too interesting – and relevant to many of you – not to share.
On Wednesday (4/7/21), the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (the Court over Georgia, Florida and Alabama) concluded in Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores that websites are not places of accommodation for purposes of Title III ADA accessibility challenges. Therefore, under the court’s decision, an accessibility barrier on a business’ website is not sufficient on its own to amount to an ADA violation.
This does not mean that one cannot file a lawsuit against a business for website accessibility issues, but the standard to prevail in these claims is certainly higher now. It is still a good idea to ensure your website is compliant especially if you offer different services or products online than you do in a brick and mortar location (if you have one). This appeared to be a key consideration by the Court in reaching the conclusion they did this week.
For additional questions on Employment Law Compliance, contact us.